lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Apr]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree
On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 07:48:44PM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> Plus, the url saves download
> bandwidth. A compelling argument I'd say.

The docs are all of 12K, I just went and looked. If you care about
bandwidth, you'd be arguing in favor of BK, it saves tons of bandwidth
compared to diff and patch.

In fact, your path to remove them proves that. If you cared about bandwidth,
you would have posted a BK patch to do it. :-)
--
---
Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitmover.com/lm
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:25    [W:0.272 / U:0.264 seconds]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site