Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 21 Apr 2002 11:08:26 -0700 | From | Larry McVoy <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree |
| |
On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 07:48:44PM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote: > Plus, the url saves download > bandwidth. A compelling argument I'd say.
The docs are all of 12K, I just went and looked. If you care about bandwidth, you'd be arguing in favor of BK, it saves tons of bandwidth compared to diff and patch.
In fact, your path to remove them proves that. If you cared about bandwidth, you would have posted a BK patch to do it. :-) -- --- Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitmover.com/lm - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |