[lkml]   [2002]   [Apr]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree
    Daniel Phillips wrote:
    > On Sunday 21 April 2002 18:57, Jeff Garzik wrote:
    > > On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 06:46:11PM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote:
    > > > Let's pull back a little from the proselytizing, shall we? I'll modify
    > > > my proposal to 'include just a pointer to the bk documentation in the
    > > > kernel tree itself'. This should satisfy everybody.
    > >
    > > No, it doesn't. It was put into the tree for convenience.
    > How much less convenient is it to click on a link? So much harder that it's
    > worth pissing off some key developers?

    Linus has already explained why he put it into the kernel sources.

    And, who are these key developers you are speaking for?

    > > It therefore stands to reason that removing it creates inconvenience.
    > > Further, the only reason to remove it is ideology. i.e. something
    > > other than technical merit. So your proposal is still a no-go.
    > According to you, yes. I'll leave it on the table.

    Linus has already explained he isn't applying your patch.


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:25    [W:0.025 / U:12.192 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site