Messages in this thread | | | From | Daniel Phillips <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree | Date | Sat, 20 Apr 2002 20:15:53 +0200 |
| |
On Sunday 21 April 2002 20:08, Larry McVoy wrote: > On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 07:48:44PM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote: > > Plus, the url saves download > > bandwidth. A compelling argument I'd say. > > The docs are all of 12K, I just went and looked. If you care about > bandwidth, you'd be arguing in favor of BK, it saves tons of bandwidth > compared to diff and patch.
All you said is 'it doesn't waste *that* much bandwidth'. Remember, this is the place we spend days arguing over a cycle or two.
-- Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |