lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Apr]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree
    Date
    On Sunday 21 April 2002 20:08, Larry McVoy wrote:
    > On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 07:48:44PM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote:
    > > Plus, the url saves download
    > > bandwidth. A compelling argument I'd say.
    >
    > The docs are all of 12K, I just went and looked. If you care about
    > bandwidth, you'd be arguing in favor of BK, it saves tons of bandwidth
    > compared to diff and patch.

    All you said is 'it doesn't waste *that* much bandwidth'. Remember, this is
    the place we spend days arguing over a cycle or two.

    --
    Daniel
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:22    [W:2.300 / U:0.168 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site