[lkml]   [2002]   [Apr]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree
    On Sunday 21 April 2002 19:55, Jeff Garzik wrote:
    > On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 07:48:44PM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote:
    > > On Sunday 21 April 2002 19:22, Jeff Garzik wrote:
    > > > Daniel Phillips wrote:
    > > > > How much less convenient is it to click on a link? So much harder that it's
    > > > > worth pissing off some key developers?
    > > > Linus has already explained why he put it into the kernel sources.
    > > So far the only argument I've seen is: it's convenient. Did I miss something?
    > > The convenience argument is bogus. A url is just as convenient,
    > If you say this, then you either missed, or are willfully ignoring,
    > what Linus said. Search for the string "".

    Linus said:

    > As to why the docs are in the kernel sources rather than on any web-sites:
    > it's simply because I don't even _have_ a web page of my own (I've long
    > since forgotten the password to my old account ;),

    Larry has offered to host it, so Linus's argument is answered.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:25    [W:0.025 / U:7.868 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site