Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Date | Thu, 19 May 2011 11:04:37 -0700 | From | Greg KH <> | Subject | [09/71] x86, hw_breakpoints: Fix racy access to ptrace breakpoints |
| |
2.6.38-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
------------------
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
commit 87dc669ba25777b67796d7262c569429e58b1ed4 upstream.
While the tracer accesses ptrace breakpoints, the child task may concurrently exit due to a SIGKILL and thus release its breakpoints at the same time. We can then dereference some freed pointers.
To fix this, hold a reference on the child breakpoints before manipulating them.
Reported-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: Prasad <prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1302284067-7860-3-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
--- arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c @@ -608,6 +608,9 @@ static int ptrace_write_dr7(struct task_ unsigned len, type; struct perf_event *bp; + if (ptrace_get_breakpoints(tsk) < 0) + return -ESRCH; + data &= ~DR_CONTROL_RESERVED; old_dr7 = ptrace_get_dr7(thread->ptrace_bps); restore: @@ -655,6 +658,9 @@ restore: } goto restore; } + + ptrace_put_breakpoints(tsk); + return ((orig_ret < 0) ? orig_ret : rc); } @@ -668,10 +674,17 @@ static unsigned long ptrace_get_debugreg if (n < HBP_NUM) { struct perf_event *bp; + + if (ptrace_get_breakpoints(tsk) < 0) + return -ESRCH; + bp = thread->ptrace_bps[n]; if (!bp) - return 0; - val = bp->hw.info.address; + val = 0; + else + val = bp->hw.info.address; + + ptrace_put_breakpoints(tsk); } else if (n == 6) { val = thread->debugreg6; } else if (n == 7) { @@ -686,6 +699,10 @@ static int ptrace_set_breakpoint_addr(st struct perf_event *bp; struct thread_struct *t = &tsk->thread; struct perf_event_attr attr; + int err = 0; + + if (ptrace_get_breakpoints(tsk) < 0) + return -ESRCH; if (!t->ptrace_bps[nr]) { ptrace_breakpoint_init(&attr); @@ -709,24 +726,23 @@ static int ptrace_set_breakpoint_addr(st * writing for the user. And anyway this is the previous * behaviour. */ - if (IS_ERR(bp)) - return PTR_ERR(bp); + if (IS_ERR(bp)) { + err = PTR_ERR(bp); + goto put; + } t->ptrace_bps[nr] = bp; } else { - int err; - bp = t->ptrace_bps[nr]; attr = bp->attr; attr.bp_addr = addr; err = modify_user_hw_breakpoint(bp, &attr); - if (err) - return err; } - - return 0; +put: + ptrace_put_breakpoints(tsk); + return err; } /*
| |