Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 07 Jul 2010 07:41:47 +0200 | From | Tejun Heo <> | Subject | Re: [PATCHSET] workqueue: implement and use WQ_UNBOUND |
| |
On 07/02/2010 11:17 AM, Tejun Heo wrote: > Arjan, I still think we'll be better off using bound workqueues for > async but let's first convert without causing behavior difference. > Either way isn't gonna result in any noticeable difference anyway. If > you're okay with the conversion, please ack it.
Ping, Arjan.
Thanks.
-- tejun
| |