[lkml]   [2010]   [Jul]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCHSET] workqueue: implement and use WQ_UNBOUND

On 07/07/2010 07:41 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On 07/02/2010 11:17 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
>> Arjan, I still think we'll be better off using bound workqueues for
>> async but let's first convert without causing behavior difference.
>> Either way isn't gonna result in any noticeable difference anyway. If
>> you're okay with the conversion, please ack it.
> Ping, Arjan.

Just for the record, I pinged Arjan again offlist and Arjan acked the
conversion in the reply. Added Acked-by and pushed the conversion to
for-next-candidate which will be pushed into linux-next the next week.



 \ /
  Last update: 2010-07-14 11:41    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital Ocean