[lkml]   [2010]   [Jul]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCHSET] workqueue: implement and use WQ_UNBOUND

    On 07/07/2010 07:41 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
    > On 07/02/2010 11:17 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
    >> Arjan, I still think we'll be better off using bound workqueues for
    >> async but let's first convert without causing behavior difference.
    >> Either way isn't gonna result in any noticeable difference anyway. If
    >> you're okay with the conversion, please ack it.
    > Ping, Arjan.

    Just for the record, I pinged Arjan again offlist and Arjan acked the
    conversion in the reply. Added Acked-by and pushed the conversion to
    for-next-candidate which will be pushed into linux-next the next week.



     \ /
      Last update: 2010-07-14 11:41    [W:0.039 / U:15.812 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site