lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [May]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: replacing X Window System !
 --- Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com> a écrit : 
> And when the windowing system crashes it'll take the
> kernel down with it - ouch.

It is already happening today with X, because :
X runs as root - ouch.
X can write into kernel memory - ouch.
X can mess with clocks - ouch.
X can mess with PCI bus - ouch.
etc. - ouch.


> And if I want to run a headless server without a
> graphical display I
> can't simply stop the windowing system I'd have to
> rebuild a kernel
> without the windowing system in it - yuck.

Is it so difficult to disable a module ? - yuck.


> What we have now is a nicely decoupled system - it
> would be even
> better if X was even more decoupled from the kernel,
> but lets not put
> the windowing system in kernel space.

We dont need 2 kernels like today.
All "dangerous code" should be in kernel.


> Do you really want to put all that complexity into
> the kernel?

Kernel is already complex, that wouldnt affect it.
But that would greatly simplify the whole system.










___________________________________________________________________________
Nouveau : téléphonez moins cher avec Yahoo! Messenger. Appelez le monde entier à partir de 0,012 €/minute !
Téléchargez sur http://fr.messenger.yahoo.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-05-17 16:57    [W:0.541 / U:0.088 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site