Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 6 Mar 2003 13:06:59 -0500 (EST) | From | "Dimitrie O. Paun" <> | Subject | Re: [patch] "HT scheduler", sched-2.5.63-B3 |
| |
On Thu, 6 Mar 2003, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> yes, an ELF flag might work, or my suggestion to allow applications to > increase their priority (up until a certain degree).
An ELF flag might be better, as it's declarative -- it allows the kernel to implement 'interactivity' in various ways, so we can keep tweeking it. Priority might prove to be a bit different than interactivity, so we better not overload the two just yet.
-- Dimi.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |