[lkml]   [2003]   [Feb]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Synchronous signal delivery..
On Sat, 15 Feb 2003, James Antill wrote:

> > I would personally like it a lot to have timer events available on
> > pollable fds. Am I alone in this ?
> Think of "timer events" as a single TCP connection, so you have...
> time X: empty
> time X+Y: timed event "Arrives"
> time X+Z: timed event "Arrives"
> which point it's pretty obvious that if you "poll" the timer
> event queue from anytime before X+Y it'll be empty, and anytime after
> X+Y it'll be "full". There isn't any point in being able to distinguish
> between the events X+Y and X+Z, you only need to know a timed event has
> occurred so you should process all timed events that are needed.
> At which point you just need to work out the difference between X and
> X+Y, and pass that to poll/sigtimedwait/etc.

I'm sorry, I'm a bit confused. What's the point here ?

- Davide

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:33    [W:0.113 / U:5.388 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site