Messages in this thread | | | From | Grahame White <> | Subject | Re: Can't wait for '2.8 or 3.0',or maybe: 2.8 followed by 2.10 ?? | Date | Thu, 18 Dec 2003 11:49:25 +0000 |
| |
On Thursday 18 December 2003 17:06, Balram Adlakha wrote: > John Bradford (john@grabjohn.com) wrote: > > I think we should consider introduce a policy of having .*beaver.* > > names for each 2.6.x release, and maybe drop the version numbers > > altogether during 2.7. > > > > John. > > Sounds like a cool idea, but how are we supposed to know which "name" > is newer?
Well let's see there could be :
2.beaver.rolling 2.beaver.sparking 2.beaver.toking 2.beaver.passing 2.beaver.stoned 2.beaver.tripping
Grahame
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |