Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: Can't wait for '2.8 or 3.0',or maybe: 2.8 followed by 2.10 ?? | From | Chris Meadors <> | Date | Thu, 18 Dec 2003 11:38:47 -0500 |
| |
On Thu, 2003-12-18 at 12:06, Balram Adlakha wrote: > John Bradford (john@grabjohn.com) wrote: > > > I think we should consider introduce a policy of having .*beaver.* > > names for each 2.6.x release, and maybe drop the version numbers > > altogether during 2.7. > > > > John. > > Sounds like a cool idea, but how are we supposed to know which "name" > is newer?
The names could be chosen alphabetically. Rooster was mentioned for 2.7, but since 2.6 is beaver, I propose cock, as 'c' follows 'b'.
-- Chris
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |