Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 18 Dec 2003 12:44:07 +0100 | From | Vojtech Pavlik <> | Subject | Re: Can't wait for '2.8 or 3.0',or maybe: 2.8 followed by 2.10 ?? |
| |
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 05:06:28PM +0000, Balram Adlakha wrote: > John Bradford (john@grabjohn.com) wrote: > > > I think we should consider introduce a policy of having .*beaver.* > > names for each 2.6.x release, and maybe drop the version numbers > > altogether during 2.7. > > > > John. > > Sounds like a cool idea, but how are we supposed to know which "name" > is newer?
Based on a logical storyline? ;)
-- Vojtech Pavlik SuSE Labs, SuSE CR - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |