lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Dec]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: Can't wait for '2.8 or 3.0',or maybe: 2.8 followed by 2.10 ??
    On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 05:06:28PM +0000, Balram Adlakha wrote:
    > John Bradford (john@grabjohn.com) wrote:
    >
    > > I think we should consider introduce a policy of having .*beaver.*
    > > names for each 2.6.x release, and maybe drop the version numbers
    > > altogether during 2.7.
    > >
    > > John.
    >
    > Sounds like a cool idea, but how are we supposed to know which "name"
    > is newer?

    Based on a logical storyline? ;)

    --
    Vojtech Pavlik
    SuSE Labs, SuSE CR
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:59    [W:0.019 / U:1.776 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site