Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 18 Dec 2003 09:33:53 -0800 | From | "Martin J. Bligh" <> | Subject | Re: Can't wait for '2.8 or 3.0',or maybe: 2.8 followed by 2.10 ?? |
| |
>> > I think we should consider introduce a policy of having .*beaver.* >> > names for each 2.6.x release, and maybe drop the version numbers >> > altogether during 2.7. >> > >> > John. >> >> Sounds like a cool idea, but how are we supposed to know which "name" >> is newer? > > The names could be chosen alphabetically. Rooster was mentioned for > 2.7, but since 2.6 is beaver, I propose cock, as 'c' follows 'b'.
Oh great. So now we've progressed from flamewars to cock fighting on LKML.
M.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |