lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Jan]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?
From

<quote who="Rob Wilkens">
> On Sun, 2003-01-12 at 17:43, Oliver Neukum wrote:
>> It's code that causes added hardship for anybody checking the locking.
>
> I can certainly see where it would seem "easier" to match "one lock" to "one unlock"
> if your troubleshooting a locking issue.
>
> "easier" is the motivation behind using goto.. Laziness.. that's all it is.

In italy we say "Non c'è peggior sordo di chi non vuole sentire"

Till to this point the thread was useful to beginners becouse of a lot of smarty coders
explained a point that everyone has heard but that rarely knows at deep...

but now Let's ignore him ! He is not a beginner he is a lamer!


--
Emiliano Gabrielli

dip. di Fisica
2° Università di Roma "Tor Vergata"


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:32    [W:0.228 / U:0.176 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site