lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Jan]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?
Date
Am Montag, 13. Januar 2003 00:05 schrieb Emiliano Gabrielli:
> <quote who="Rob Wilkens">
>
> > On Sun, 2003-01-12 at 17:43, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> >> It's code that causes added hardship for anybody checking the locking.
> >
> > I can certainly see where it would seem "easier" to match "one lock" to
> > "one unlock" if your troubleshooting a locking issue.
> >
> > "easier" is the motivation behind using goto.. Laziness.. that's all it
> > is.
>
> In italy we say "Non c'è peggior sordo di chi non vuole sentire"

There's no worse fate than that of those who don't want to listen?
(My Italian is bad.)

> Till to this point the thread was useful to beginners becouse of a lot of
> smarty coders explained a point that everyone has heard but that rarely
> knows at deep...
>
> but now Let's ignore him ! He is not a beginner he is a lamer!

Very well. What could be said has been said. But please don't insult him.
Time spent explaining is usually well spent. Perhaps somebody learned.

OK, maybe I have a soft spot.

Regards
Oliver

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:32    [W:0.145 / U:22.420 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site