[lkml]   [2003]   [Jan]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?

<quote who="Oliver Neukum">
> Am Montag, 13. Januar 2003 00:05 schrieb Emiliano Gabrielli:
>> <quote who="Rob Wilkens">
>> > On Sun, 2003-01-12 at 17:43, Oliver Neukum wrote:
>> >> It's code that causes added hardship for anybody checking the locking.
>> >
>> > I can certainly see where it would seem "easier" to match "one lock" to "one
>> unlock" if your troubleshooting a locking issue.
>> >
>> > "easier" is the motivation behind using goto.. Laziness.. that's all it is.
>> In italy we say "Non c'è peggior sordo di chi non vuole sentire"
> There's no worse fate than that of those who don't want to listen? (My Italian is
> bad.)

It is better than my english :-))

>> Till to this point the thread was useful to beginners becouse of a lot of smarty
>> coders explained a point that everyone has heard but that rarely knows at deep...
>> but now Let's ignore him ! He is not a beginner he is a lamer!
> Very well. What could be said has been said. But please don't insult him. Time spent
> explaining is usually well spent. Perhaps somebody learned.

I agree .. my apologises .. I use currently the word "lamer" in IRC, but I don't really
know the true translation.. if it is an insult .. plz adcept my apologises

> OK, maybe I have a soft spot.


> Regards
> Oliver

Emiliano Gabrielli

dip. di Fisica
2° Università di Roma "Tor Vergata"

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:32    [W:0.211 / U:1.896 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site