lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Mar]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: IO delay, port 0x80, and BIOS POST codes
From
Date
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com> writes:

> On Thu, 14 Mar 2002, John Heil wrote:
> >
> > No, the better/correct port is 0xED which removes the conflict.
>
> Port ED is fine for a BIOS, which (by definition) knows what the
> motherboard devices are, and thus knows that ED cannot be used by
> anything.
>
> But it _is_ an unused port, and that's exactly the kind of thing that
> might be used sometime in the future. Remember the port 22/23 brouhaha
> with Cyrix using it for their stuff, and later Intel getting into the fray
> too?
>
> So the fact that ED works doesn't mean that _stays_ working.
>
> The fact that 80 is the post code register means that it is fairly likely
> to _stay_ that way, without any ugly surprises.
>
> Now, if there is something _else_ than just the fact that it is unused
> that makes ED a good choice in the future too, that might be worth looking
> into (like NT using it for the same purpose as Linux does port 80),

Does the logic outb_p uses continue to work if you have a PCI post
card (possibly on the motherboard). And an ISA device?

Systems without ISA slots but with ISA or LPC devices onboard must
use a PCI post card so I have trouble believing that outb_b and friends
really work as expected....


Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:25    [W:1.853 / U:0.300 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site