[lkml]   [2002]   [Jan]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: PATCH ext2 unbork fs.h (part 1/7)
On January 7, 2002 10:27 pm, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Daniel Phillips wrote:
> > On January 7, 2002 03:13 pm, Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
> > > Of course fs which are not adapted would still just work with the fs_i()
> > > and fs_sb() macros and/or using two separate pointers.
> >
> > Yes, the fs_* macros are the really critical part of all this. I'd like to
> > get them in early, while we hash out the rest of it. I think Jeff supports
> > me in this, possibly Al as well.
> agreed, from my side

OK, are we agreed that:

- We're waiting for Al to merge ext/*alloc.c changes

- When that's done we will apply what would be my unbork patches (2: ext2_i) and
(3: ext2_sb) to both 2.4.current and 2.5.current? Subject to getting these two
patches into the form everybody likes, of course.

- We have some time in the interim to figure out how best to unbork fs.h, but we
all agree it needs to be done soon.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:15    [W:0.191 / U:0.148 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site