lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Jan]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [Ext2-devel] Re: PATCH 2.5.2.9: ext2 unbork fs.h (part 1/7)
On Jan 07, 2002  18:46 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> I greatly prefer function pointers to [possibly] generic obj management
> code, to storing object sizes. Some filesystem is inevitably going to
> want to do something even more clever with inode allocation. My method
> gives developers the freedom to experiement with inode alloc to their
> heart's desires, without affecting any other filesystem.

Oh, I totally agree. I think stacking filesystems will generally want to
be able to do their own inode-private allocation.

Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
http://sourceforge.net/projects/ext2resize/
http://www-mddsp.enel.ucalgary.ca/People/adilger/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:15    [W:0.186 / U:0.360 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site