[lkml]   [2002]   [Jan]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: PATCH ext2 unbork fs.h (part 1/7)
On January 8, 2002 12:48 am, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > Moving the ext2 headers from include/linux to fs/ext2 is an interesting
> > feature of your patch, though it isn't essential to the idea you're
> > presenting. But is there a good reason why ext2_fs_i.h and ext2_fs_sb.h
> > should remain separate from ext2_fs.h? It looks like gratuitous
> > modularity to me.
> apparently userspace includes them, which is the reason for the strange
> types. good reason to continue to keep them separate. That's also why
> my patch7 adds an ifdef __KERNEL__.

It's unnecessary for userspace to include those headers, they are

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:15    [W:0.065 / U:0.444 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site