Messages in this thread |  | | From | Daniel Phillips <> | Subject | Re: PATCH 2.5.2.9: ext2 unbork fs.h (part 1/7) | Date | Tue, 8 Jan 2002 04:28:53 +0100 |
| |
On January 8, 2002 12:48 am, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > Moving the ext2 headers from include/linux to fs/ext2 is an interesting > > feature of your patch, though it isn't essential to the idea you're > > presenting. But is there a good reason why ext2_fs_i.h and ext2_fs_sb.h > > should remain separate from ext2_fs.h? It looks like gratuitous > > modularity to me. > > apparently userspace includes them, which is the reason for the strange > types. good reason to continue to keep them separate. That's also why > my patch7 adds an ifdef __KERNEL__.
It's unnecessary for userspace to include those headers, they are kernel-private.
-- Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |