Messages in this thread | | | From | Justin Carlson <> | Subject | Re: CML2 design philosophy heads-up | Date | Fri, 18 May 2001 08:37:30 -0700 |
| |
On Fri, 18 May 2001, Jes Sorensen wrote:
> Oh I don't, on the other hand I see you consistently ignoring the > needs and requirements of the users. So far I haven't heard a single > developer say something positive about CML2, the most positive I have > heard so far has been "whatever", "it's his choice", "I don't care", > "I want to hack". The majority are of the "NO!" and "you got to be > kiddin'".
Perhaps your hearing has gone more than a bit selective. Please, allow me to be the first to get through:
I think CML2 looks very interesting, and while it's not quite primetime yet, it's definitely a movement in the right direction. I'd even go sofar as to say I think CML2 is a GOOD THING.
Or perhaps you have a more selective definition of developer?
-Justin carlson@sibyte.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |