Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Wed, 7 Nov 2001 16:00:55 +0100 (CET) | From | Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk <> | Subject | ext3 vs resiserfs vs xfs |
| |
hi
What's coolest/best/worst of ext3, ReiserFS and XFS? I just set up a RedHat 7.2 box with ext3, and after a few tests/chrashes, I see no difference at all. After a chrash, it really wants to run fsck anyway. I've tried ReiserFS before, with no fsck after chrashes - is this because ReiserFS is better, or is it more like a hope-it's-ok-thinkig? Then - last - How about XFS?
roy
-- Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk, MCSE, MCNE, CLS, LCA
Computers are like air conditioners. They stop working when you open Windows.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |