Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 07 Nov 2001 19:40:27 +0000 | From | Anton Altaparmakov <> | Subject | Re: ext3 vs resiserfs vs xfs |
| |
At 19:12 07/11/2001, Alan Cox wrote: > > when coming back up it fscked (I didn't touch anything - didn't even > notice > > any 5 second thing but I wasn't looking at this screen) and it found two > > lost inodes (I got two entries in lost and found). So it still needs to > > fsck by the looks of it? > >That sounds like you used your own kernel with it and had ext2 mounting >the root fs (remember its back compatible)
Yes, that makes a lot of sense. After the reset I went into my own kernel with both ext2 and ext3 compiled into it. However, before the reboot, I was still in the RH kernel (99% sure it was so, but my memory might be deceiving me).
Is there any Right Way(TM) to fix this situation considering I want to have both ext2 and ext3 in my kernels (apart from the obvious of changing the order fs are called during root mount in the kernel)?
Thanks,
Anton
-- "I've not lost my mind. It's backed up on tape somewhere." - Unknown -- Anton Altaparmakov <aia21 at cam.ac.uk> (replace at with @) Linux NTFS Maintainer / WWW: http://linux-ntfs.sf.net/ ICQ: 8561279 / WWW: http://www-stu.christs.cam.ac.uk/~aia21/
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |