lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Nov]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Regression testing of 2.4.x before release?
"Timothy D. Witham" wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2001-11-11 at 22:24, Dan Kegel wrote:
> > At some point it might be nice to also use the STP to help
> > speed gcc 3 development, too. (I personally am really
> > looking forward to the day when I can use the same compiler
> > for both c++ and kernel.)
>
> Strange, I was just talking to somebody about compiler
> performance and regression issues and what sort of automation
> could be done to do that sort of testing.
>
> Since the STP is really a framework and just about any piece
> of software and testing environment could be worked into it.
>
> So I guess you could have two pieces. One that just ran a bunch
> of compile and user level tests and then one that went in and
> checked out the compiler on a kernel tree and then ran the
> same performance tests that had been run using the "standard"
> compiler.

Go/no-go tests, where you make sure a kernel compiled with gcc 3
actually works, might be appropriate for starters. I don't know
if that's been established yet.

> Are you stepping forward to integrate this into STP? :-)

I wish! Alas, tendinitis makes hacking hazardous for me for now.

- Dan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:13    [W:0.099 / U:5.936 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site