[lkml]   [2002]   [Jan]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
Subject[OT] Re: Regression testing of 2.4.x before release?

On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 04:04:59PM -0800, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
> One particular application for which gcc 3.x *and* gcc 2.96.x are
> seriously deficient, at least on Intel/AMD 32-bit systems, is the
> high-performance linear algebra library Atlas. As a result, *my* default
> for compiling numerical applications is the Atlas-recommended one,
> 2.95.3. For the kernel, I use whatever the Red Hat 7.2 default is.

One of the problems of gcc-3 is taking decisions when to inline and when
not. This can hurt numerical code a lot, especially C++.
You may want to use -finline-limit-XXX to tune.
v1 of my patch went into 3.0.3, some version (don't know which) into
mainline, so 3.0.3 should do better.

Kurt Garloff <> Eindhoven, NL
GPG key: See mail header, key servers Linux kernel development
SuSE GmbH, Nuernberg, DE SCSI, Security
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:15    [W:0.077 / U:4.592 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site