| Date | Wed, 16 Jul 1997 11:48:28 +0000 (GMT) | From | Ben Clifford <> | Subject | Re: 2.0.31 : please! |
| |
On Wed, 16 Jul 1997, Daniel G. Link wrote:
> If this would be checked by about 10 people with reasonable configurations > (recent GCC, binutils), it would not go unnoticed. [...] > If there is a reason why non-compiling code has to be in the kernel > sources (I would be hard-pressed to find one), then at least there should > be a file "LATEST_COMPILING_<whatever>_IS_<version number>" in the kernel > source directory. [...] > Like I said, I would volunteer to test-compile 2.1.X kernels.
Why not set up a group of peopleto do this - test the 2.1.x kernels as they are released. Then, post a summary of your findings to the kernel list so people can judge if they want to try it or not.
|