[lkml]   [2010]   [Dec]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [cpuops cmpxchg V2 5/5] cpuops: Use cmpxchg for xchg to avoid lock semantics
    Hey, again.

    On 12/15/2010 05:39 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
    > I'd prefer percpu things going through percpu tree, if for nothing
    > else for git history's sake, but I don't think it really matters. The
    > series is spread all over the place anyway. As long as each
    > maintainer is properly alerted about the changes, it should be okay.
    > Please let me know whether you agree with the changes currently queued
    > in percpu#for-next. I'll update the tree with your Acked-by's and
    > freeze it.

    Are you okay with the patches currently in percpu#for-next? If so,
    I'll regenerate patches with your acked-by and pop the two previously
    mentioned commits and proceed with the rest of the series.

    Thank you.


     \ /
      Last update: 2010-12-16 17:17    [W:0.019 / U:12.112 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site