[lkml]   [2010]   [Dec]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [cpuops cmpxchg V2 5/5] cpuops: Use cmpxchg for xchg to avoid lock semantics
Hey, again.

On 12/15/2010 05:39 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> I'd prefer percpu things going through percpu tree, if for nothing
> else for git history's sake, but I don't think it really matters. The
> series is spread all over the place anyway. As long as each
> maintainer is properly alerted about the changes, it should be okay.
> Please let me know whether you agree with the changes currently queued
> in percpu#for-next. I'll update the tree with your Acked-by's and
> freeze it.

Are you okay with the patches currently in percpu#for-next? If so,
I'll regenerate patches with your acked-by and pop the two previously
mentioned commits and proceed with the rest of the series.

Thank you.


 \ /
  Last update: 2010-12-16 17:17    [W:0.099 / U:1.404 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site