[lkml]   [2010]   [Dec]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [cpuops cmpxchg V2 5/5] cpuops: Use cmpxchg for xchg to avoid lock semantics
On 12/16/2010 08:14 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Are you okay with the patches currently in percpu#for-next? If so,
> I'll regenerate patches with your acked-by and pop the two previously
> mentioned commits and proceed with the rest of the series.
> Thank you.

Still looking through them (sorry.) I note that we probably do need to
get Christoph's followup patches into -tip, so we need to get it all
into tip; as such, even if it goes through your tree I'll need to pull
it into a tip branch.


H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.

 \ /
  Last update: 2010-12-16 19:23    [W:0.071 / U:5.064 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site