lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Dec]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateThu, 16 Dec 2010 12:42:07 -0800
From"H. Peter Anvin" <>
SubjectRe: [cpuops cmpxchg V2 5/5] cpuops: Use cmpxchg for xchg to avoid lock semantics
On 12/16/2010 08:14 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hey, again.
>
> On 12/15/2010 05:39 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
>> I'd prefer percpu things going through percpu tree, if for nothing
>> else for git history's sake, but I don't think it really matters. The
>> series is spread all over the place anyway. As long as each
>> maintainer is properly alerted about the changes, it should be okay.
>> Please let me know whether you agree with the changes currently queued
>> in percpu#for-next. I'll update the tree with your Acked-by's and
>> freeze it.
>
> Are you okay with the patches currently in percpu#for-next? If so,
> I'll regenerate patches with your acked-by and pop the two previously
> mentioned commits and proceed with the rest of the series.
>

Just finished reviewing the patches in percpu#for-next.

Acked-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>

Look good. Let me know when you have a baseline I can pull into a tip
branch so we can build the rest of the patches on top.

-hpa


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-12-16 21:45    [from the cache]
©2003-2010