[lkml]   [2010]   [Dec]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [cpuops cmpxchg V2 5/5] cpuops: Use cmpxchg for xchg to avoid lock semantics

On 12/16/2010 07:19 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 12/16/2010 08:14 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
>> Are you okay with the patches currently in percpu#for-next? If so,
>> I'll regenerate patches with your acked-by and pop the two previously
>> mentioned commits and proceed with the rest of the series.
> Still looking through them (sorry.) I note that we probably do need to
> get Christoph's followup patches into -tip, so we need to get it all
> into tip; as such, even if it goes through your tree I'll need to pull
> it into a tip branch.

Yeah, no problem. Pekka also wants to pull the essential part into
the memory allocator part, so I think it would be best to keep at
least the proper percpu part and x86 specific ops in percpu tree tho.



 \ /
  Last update: 2010-12-16 19:59    [W:0.074 / U:3.500 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site