[lkml]   [2007]   [Apr]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: suspend2 merge (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy)

    On Wed, 25 Apr 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote:

    > For me it was a serious regression if STD was removed without any
    > replacement.

    Amen. I have even made material donations to the SS2 effort to give the
    developer what he'd needed to fix an issue with a certain configuration
    and will do so again if need be, as that expense would be minor compared
    to the productivity (== billing) loss that arises from having to start
    over from scratch from each of the 3+ times per day I have to shutdown
    and physically relocate my machine from place-to-place or client-to-client.


    Kenneth R. Crudup Sr. SW Engineer, Scott County Consulting, Los Angeles
    O: 3630 S. Sepulveda Blvd. #138, L.A., CA 90034-6809 (888) 454-8181
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-04-26 00:23    [W:0.038 / U:0.192 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site