[lkml]   [2007]   [Apr]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: suspend2 merge (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy)

On Wed, 25 Apr 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote:

> For me it was a serious regression if STD was removed without any
> replacement.

Amen. I have even made material donations to the SS2 effort to give the
developer what he'd needed to fix an issue with a certain configuration
and will do so again if need be, as that expense would be minor compared
to the productivity (== billing) loss that arises from having to start
over from scratch from each of the 3+ times per day I have to shutdown
and physically relocate my machine from place-to-place or client-to-client.


Kenneth R. Crudup Sr. SW Engineer, Scott County Consulting, Los Angeles
O: 3630 S. Sepulveda Blvd. #138, L.A., CA 90034-6809 (888) 454-8181
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-04-26 00:23    [W:1.123 / U:0.564 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site