Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 31 May 2006 16:38:11 -0700 | From | Martin Bligh <> | Subject | Re: 2.6.17-rc5-mm1 |
| |
Andrew Morton wrote: > "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@mbligh.org> wrote: > >>Andrew Morton wrote: >> >>>Martin Bligh <mbligh@google.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>>>The x86_65 panic in LTP has changed a bit. Looks more useful now. >>>>Possibly just unrelated new stuff. Possibly we got lucky. >>> >>>What are you doing to make this happen? >> >>runalltests on LTP >> > > > We have to get to the bottom of this - there's a shadow over about 500 > patches and we don't know which. > > iirc I tried to reproduce this a couple of weeks back and failed. > > Are you able to narrow it down to a particular LTP test? It was mtest01 or > something like that? Perhaps we can identify a particular command line > which triggers the fault in a standalone fashion?
The LTP output is here:
http://test.kernel.org/abat/33803/debug/test.log.1
The last test run was memset01
From a good test run (http://test.kernel.org/abat/33964/debug/test.log.1) the one after memset01 is a second instance of the same.
Which is bad I suppose, in that it's likely an intermittent failure. Perhaps you can try running memset01 in a loop? I don't have such a box set up here right now, I'm afraid ... will see what I can do.
OTOH, it looks like this might be a different failure than the double fault we saw in previous -mm's, which was consistently in mtest01, IIRC.
M. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |