[lkml]   [2006]   [Apr]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RESEND][RFC][PATCH 2/7] implementation of LSM hooks

On Mon, 17 Apr 2006 23:55:25 BST, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 03:15:29PM -0700, Gerrit Huizenga wrote:
> > configure correctly that most of them disable it. In theory, LSM +
> > something like AppArmour provides a much simpler security model for
> apparmor falls into the findamentally broken category above, so it's
> totally uninteresting except as marketing candy for the big red company.

Is there a pointer to why it is fundamentally broken? I haven't seen
such comments before but it may be that I've been hanging out on the
wrong lists or spending too much time inhaling air at 30,000 feet.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-04-18 03:48    [W:0.193 / U:3.444 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site