lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Apr]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [RESEND][RFC][PATCH 2/7] implementation of LSM hooks
Date

On Mon, 17 Apr 2006 15:31:08 EDT, James Morris wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Apr 2006, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
>
> > Hopefully a new version of evm+slim+ima will be ready for distribution
> > soon.
>
> Why are you still trying to introduce yet another access control model
> into the kernel, when SELinux is already there?

I get the impression from customers that SELinux is so painful to
configure correctly that most of them disable it. In theory, LSM +
something like AppArmour provides a much simpler security model for
normal human beings who want some level of configuration. Also,
the current SELinux config in RH is starting to have a measureable
performance impact. I'm not sure this particular battle of the
security models is quite over from a real user perspective.

gerrit
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-04-18 00:19    [W:0.828 / U:0.520 seconds]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans