lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Apr]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RESEND][RFC][PATCH 2/7] implementation of LSM hooks
On Mon, 17 Apr 2006, Alan Cox wrote:

> > something like AppArmour provides a much simpler security model for
>
> If the AppArmour people care to submit their code upstream and get it
> merged then that would be a reason to keep LSM, if they don't then LSM
> (if they even want it..) can just become part of their patchkit instead.

This is the discussion we had a year ago, and have seen nothing
upstream since. I assume they do not intend to submit the code.



- James
--
James Morris
<jmorris@namei.org>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-04-18 01:00    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans