lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Apr]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [RESEND][RFC][PATCH 2/7] implementation of LSM hooks
    On Mon, 17 Apr 2006, Alan Cox wrote:

    > > something like AppArmour provides a much simpler security model for
    >
    > If the AppArmour people care to submit their code upstream and get it
    > merged then that would be a reason to keep LSM, if they don't then LSM
    > (if they even want it..) can just become part of their patchkit instead.

    This is the discussion we had a year ago, and have seen nothing
    upstream since. I assume they do not intend to submit the code.



    - James
    --
    James Morris
    <jmorris@namei.org>
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2006-04-18 01:00    [W:0.019 / U:32.272 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site