[lkml]   [1998]   [Sep]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Building Big Ass Linux Machine, what are the limits?
| Where you want safe delayed write, than controllers with cache
| can have one important advantage: battery backup for the cache memory
| on board;
| Whether the cost is justified - this depends on application.
| Assuming the server will never die for any reason (including RAM failure,
| UPS failure, etc) - extra RAM is surely the way to go, but how can one
| be sure?

I read a paper ( the other
day about the WAFL filesystem (used on the Network Appliances at The NetApp boxes use NVRAM to record a log of NFS activity
since the last write to disk, and it does a consistency "snapshot" at least
once every 10 seconds. Basically it comes down to this: The filesystem on
disk is always consistent (ie: no fsck needed after reboot), and the nvram
stores what changed since the last write (battery backed up so a power failure
doesn't kill it) ...

It's pretty nifty, in the middle of it doing things, you can just flip the
power switch. Turn it back on, wait about a minute for the thing to boot, and
you're back up and running.

I'm not sure if the design is "free for use", but it would be very nice to
have as an addition to Linux if it is available for general use.

Randomly Generated Tagline:
"Besides, I think [Slackware] sounds better than 'Microsoft,' don't you?"
- Patrick Volkerding

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:44    [W:0.087 / U:1.796 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site