[lkml]   [1998]   [Sep]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Building Big Ass Linux Machine, what are the limits?
On 28 Sep 1998 wrote:

> PPro, while a good CPU is getting old, the Quad board costs $1000, and
> the PII is probably cheaper. You should be able to put together a dual
> PII at 350MHz for the price of the Quad board alone, it will be as fast,
> and have higher memory bandwidth etc for free.

if you like to live dangerously :) getting the celeron 300A and
overclocking to 450 seems like the best bang for the buck right now. My
coworker reports this being rocksolid. Of course I wouldn't do this for a

> RAID mirroring is fast and reliable, but expensive, RAID striping with
> error correction, is cheaper in disk cost, but much slower writing.
> (When will we see a mirrored volume acting as a cache for a larger
> stripe/ecc volume? HP does something like this, I think)
> Last time the cache discussion was brought up - a long time ago, surely,
> it was concluded that controllers with cache was evil - or at best, a
> waste of money, and that that money was better spent on RAM, which is
> usually cheaper and faster, anyway. Has something changed?

The linux raid md stuff works amazingly well, at one point we had
something like a 67GB software raid5 here and it worked just fine except
when it crashed. Hope the journaling stuff is coming soon.

> > 2.0, almost; the 2.1/2.2 series is definately ready.
> Wouldn't you want to run 2.2.x, where x is large enough that most bugs
> have been weeded out of 2.2.0? 2.1 is still labeled "experimental", and
> there's been enough troubles with the latest kernels that I'd wait a bit
> longer for an enterprise-critical system.

AFAIK, there is no 2.2.x. =) We currently use 2.1.86+patches as our stable
kernel. People that live dangerously use the latest kernel currently at
2.1.123 (untested by me). So the "later" kernels are okay just not the


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:44    [W:0.051 / U:2.776 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site