lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2024]   [Mar]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH] locking/mutex: fix documentation spelling mistakes
Date
fix 'task_strcut' to 'task_struct'

Signed-off-by: Yuu Lee <379943137@qq.com>
---
kernel/locking/mutex.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/locking/mutex.c b/kernel/locking/mutex.c
index cbae8c0b8..82d19846e 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/mutex.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/mutex.c
@@ -362,7 +362,7 @@ bool mutex_spin_on_owner(struct mutex *lock, struct task_struct *owner,
* checking lock->owner still matches owner. And we already
* disabled preemption which is equal to the RCU read-side
* crital section in optimistic spinning code. Thus the
- * task_strcut structure won't go away during the spinning
+ * task_struct structure won't go away during the spinning
* period
*/
barrier();
@@ -401,7 +401,7 @@ static inline int mutex_can_spin_on_owner(struct mutex *lock)

/*
* We already disabled preemption which is equal to the RCU read-side
- * crital section in optimistic spinning code. Thus the task_strcut
+ * crital section in optimistic spinning code. Thus the task_struct
* structure won't go away during the spinning period.
*/
owner = __mutex_owner(lock);
--
2.41.0

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2024-03-13 10:08    [W:0.020 / U:3.536 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site