lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2024]   [Mar]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] locking/mutex: fix documentation spelling mistakes

* Yuu Lee <379943137@qq.com> wrote:

> fix 'task_strcut' to 'task_struct'
>
> Signed-off-by: Yuu Lee <379943137@qq.com>
> ---
> kernel/locking/mutex.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/locking/mutex.c b/kernel/locking/mutex.c
> index cbae8c0b8..82d19846e 100644
> --- a/kernel/locking/mutex.c
> +++ b/kernel/locking/mutex.c
> @@ -362,7 +362,7 @@ bool mutex_spin_on_owner(struct mutex *lock, struct task_struct *owner,
> * checking lock->owner still matches owner. And we already
> * disabled preemption which is equal to the RCU read-side
> * crital section in optimistic spinning code. Thus the
> - * task_strcut structure won't go away during the spinning
> + * task_struct structure won't go away during the spinning
> * period
> */
> barrier();
> @@ -401,7 +401,7 @@ static inline int mutex_can_spin_on_owner(struct mutex *lock)
>
> /*
> * We already disabled preemption which is equal to the RCU read-side
> - * crital section in optimistic spinning code. Thus the task_strcut
> + * crital section in optimistic spinning code. Thus the task_struct
> * structure won't go away during the spinning period.

There's another typo here, which you might as well fix?

Thanks,

Ingo

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2024-03-13 11:23    [W:0.033 / U:8.480 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site