Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 13 Mar 2024 11:22:35 +0100 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] locking/mutex: fix documentation spelling mistakes |
| |
* Yuu Lee <379943137@qq.com> wrote:
> fix 'task_strcut' to 'task_struct' > > Signed-off-by: Yuu Lee <379943137@qq.com> > --- > kernel/locking/mutex.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/kernel/locking/mutex.c b/kernel/locking/mutex.c > index cbae8c0b8..82d19846e 100644 > --- a/kernel/locking/mutex.c > +++ b/kernel/locking/mutex.c > @@ -362,7 +362,7 @@ bool mutex_spin_on_owner(struct mutex *lock, struct task_struct *owner, > * checking lock->owner still matches owner. And we already > * disabled preemption which is equal to the RCU read-side > * crital section in optimistic spinning code. Thus the > - * task_strcut structure won't go away during the spinning > + * task_struct structure won't go away during the spinning > * period > */ > barrier(); > @@ -401,7 +401,7 @@ static inline int mutex_can_spin_on_owner(struct mutex *lock) > > /* > * We already disabled preemption which is equal to the RCU read-side > - * crital section in optimistic spinning code. Thus the task_strcut > + * crital section in optimistic spinning code. Thus the task_struct > * structure won't go away during the spinning period.
There's another typo here, which you might as well fix?
Thanks,
Ingo
| |