Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | From | Valentin Schneider <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] lib/cpumask: update comment for cpumask_local_spread() | Date | Wed, 14 Dec 2022 09:47:47 +0000 |
| |
On 12/12/22 20:32, Yury Norov wrote: > Now that we have an iterator-based alternative for a very common case > of using cpumask_local_spread for all cpus in a row, it's worth to > mention it in comment to cpumask_local_spread(). > > Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com> > --- > > Hi Tariq, Valentin, > > I rebased your iterators patches on top of cpumask_local_spread() rework. > (Rebase is not plain simple.) The result is on bitmap-for-next branch, > and in -next too. >
I had a look, LGTM.
> This patch adds a note on alternative approach in cpumask_local_spread() > comment, as we discussed before. > > I'm going to send pull request with cpumask_local_spread() rework by the > end of this week. If you want, I can include your patches in the request. > Otherwise please consider appending this patch to your series. >
It would probably make sense to send it all together, especially since you went through the trouble of rebasing the patches :)
Thanks!
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |