Messages in this thread |  | | From | Valentin Schneider <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] lib/cpumask: update comment for cpumask_local_spread() | Date | Thu, 15 Dec 2022 18:32:30 +0000 |
| |
On 14/12/22 08:48, Yury Norov wrote: > On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 09:47:47AM +0000, Valentin Schneider wrote: >> On 12/12/22 20:32, Yury Norov wrote: >> > Now that we have an iterator-based alternative for a very common case >> > of using cpumask_local_spread for all cpus in a row, it's worth to >> > mention it in comment to cpumask_local_spread(). >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com> >> > --- >> > >> > Hi Tariq, Valentin, >> > >> > I rebased your iterators patches on top of cpumask_local_spread() rework. >> > (Rebase is not plain simple.) The result is on bitmap-for-next branch, >> > and in -next too. >> > >> >> I had a look, LGTM. > > Does it mean reviewed-by? If so - for the whole cpumask_local_spread() > series, or for the last patch?
Ah sorry, I meant I had a look at your branch for the result of the rebase which looks sane to me.
Feel free to add Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com> for this patch.
|  |