lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Jun]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: linux-next: Tree for Jun 26 (security/integrity/ima/)
Date
Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com> wrote:

> > CC security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.o
> > In file included from ../security/integrity/ima/ima.h:25:0,
> > from ../security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c:26:
> > ../security/integrity/ima/../integrity.h:170:18: warning: ‘struct key_acl’ declared inside parameter list [enabled by default]
> > struct key_acl *acl)
> > ^
> > ../security/integrity/ima/../integrity.h:170:18: warning: its scope is only this definition or declaration, which is probably not what you want [enabled by default]
>
> David, CONFIG_INTEGRITY_SIGNATURE is dependent on KEYS being enabled,
> but the stub functions are not.  There's now a dependency on
> key_acl().

I added a forward declaration for struct key_acl into
security/integrity/integrity.h as you can see here:

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dhowells/linux-fs.git/diff/security/integrity/integrity.h?h=keys-acl&id=75ce113a1d56880e5abd37fa664ea9af399d2bcd

which might not have made it into linux-next before you used it.

David

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-06-27 15:30    [W:0.484 / U:0.264 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site