lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Jun]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: linux-next: Tree for Jun 26 (security/integrity/ima/)
From
Date
On 6/27/19 6:29 AM, David Howells wrote:
> Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>>> CC security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.o
>>> In file included from ../security/integrity/ima/ima.h:25:0,
>>> from ../security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c:26:
>>> ../security/integrity/ima/../integrity.h:170:18: warning: ‘struct key_acl’ declared inside parameter list [enabled by default]
>>> struct key_acl *acl)
>>> ^
>>> ../security/integrity/ima/../integrity.h:170:18: warning: its scope is only this definition or declaration, which is probably not what you want [enabled by default]
>>
>> David, CONFIG_INTEGRITY_SIGNATURE is dependent on KEYS being enabled,
>> but the stub functions are not.  There's now a dependency on
>> key_acl().
>
> I added a forward declaration for struct key_acl into
> security/integrity/integrity.h as you can see here:
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dhowells/linux-fs.git/diff/security/integrity/integrity.h?h=keys-acl&id=75ce113a1d56880e5abd37fa664ea9af399d2bcd
>
> which might not have made it into linux-next before you used it.

No problem in linux-next 20190627.

Thanks.

--
~Randy

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-06-27 17:08    [W:0.085 / U:0.224 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site