lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Jun]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: linux-next: Tree for Jun 26 (security/integrity/ima/)
From
Date
[Cc'ing David Howells]

On Wed, 2019-06-26 at 11:35 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 6/26/19 6:16 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > The sparc64 builds are broken in this tree, sorry.
> >
> > Changes since 20190625:
> >
>
> on x86_64:
>
> 11 warnings like this one (in a randconfig build):
>
> CC security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.o
> In file included from ../security/integrity/ima/ima.h:25:0,
> from ../security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c:26:
> ../security/integrity/ima/../integrity.h:170:18: warning: ‘struct key_acl’ declared inside parameter list [enabled by default]
> struct key_acl *acl)
> ^
> ../security/integrity/ima/../integrity.h:170:18: warning: its scope is only this definition or declaration, which is probably not what you want [enabled by default]

David, CONFIG_INTEGRITY_SIGNATURE is dependent on KEYS being enabled,
but the stub functions are not.  There's now a dependency on
key_acl().

Mimi

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-06-27 15:03    [W:0.077 / U:0.292 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site