Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: ALSA: nm256: Fine-tuning for three function implementations | From | SF Markus Elfring <> | Date | Tue, 28 Nov 2017 17:15:27 +0100 |
| |
> Because I didn't see any test result from you,
This is correct so far.
> so I can't trust you.
This view did not hinder you to integrate some of my update suggestions which you found easier to handle.
>> Which test configurations would you trust finally? > > Do test whatever like the users do.
I find such an information too unsafe for an official acceptance test.
>> How can such descriptions improve the trust situation? > > It's the first step. At least then I can see you did some test. > Currently nothing. zero. nada.
I am unsure if acceptable test results will ever be published for this software module.
> How can I trust it?
* Would you dare to inspect the shown source code adjustments again?
* How do you think about to sort the remaining update candidates by their change size (or software age)?
Regards, Markus
| |