[lkml]   [2017]   [Nov]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: ALSA: nm256: Fine-tuning for three function implementations
> Because I didn't see any test result from you,

This is correct so far.

> so I can't trust you.

This view did not hinder you to integrate some of my update suggestions
which you found easier to handle.

>> Which test configurations would you trust finally?
> Do test whatever like the users do.

I find such an information too unsafe for an official acceptance test.

>> How can such descriptions improve the trust situation?
> It's the first step. At least then I can see you did some test.
> Currently nothing. zero. nada.

I am unsure if acceptable test results will ever be published for this
software module.

> How can I trust it?

* Would you dare to inspect the shown source code adjustments again?

* How do you think about to sort the remaining update candidates
by their change size (or software age)?


 \ /
  Last update: 2017-11-28 17:17    [W:0.066 / U:2.724 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site