lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Jun]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH] ftrace: correct the counter increment for trace_buffer data
Date
In ftrace_dump, for disabling buffer, iter.tr->trace_buffer.data is used.
But for enabling, iter.trace_buffer->data is used.
Even though, both point to same buffer, for readability, same convention
should be used.

Signed-off-by: Umesh Tiwari <umesh.t@samsung.com>
---
kernel/trace/trace.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.c b/kernel/trace/trace.c
index 62c6506..e6dc9c3 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c
@@ -6698,7 +6698,7 @@ void ftrace_dump(enum ftrace_dump_mode oops_dump_mode)
trace_init_global_iter(&iter);

for_each_tracing_cpu(cpu) {
- atomic_inc(&per_cpu_ptr(iter.tr->trace_buffer.data, cpu)->disabled);
+ atomic_inc(&per_cpu_ptr(iter.trace_buffer->data, cpu)->disabled);
}

old_userobj = trace_flags & TRACE_ITER_SYM_USEROBJ;
--
1.7.9.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-06-22 13:41    [W:0.031 / U:0.152 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site