[lkml]   [2012]   [Feb]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Linux 3.3-rc4
Le mardi 21 février 2012 à 14:43 -0800, Linus Torvalds a écrit :
> On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 5:42 AM, Thomas Meyer <> wrote:
> >
> > 2.) while debugging above issue: I did find an minor bug in sys_poll() - nobody did take care of my proposed patch:
> Ok, so I started out forward-porting that patch to current -git
> (trivial: it's just that the system call tables are differently
> generated now), but the more I look at it, the more I suspect that we
> should perhaps just globally fix "sys_poll()" to have the timeout
> argument be 'int'.
> Because that *is* the standard user interface (just do "man 2 poll"),
> and while all of the git history (and all of the BK history) we've had
> it as "long", I suspect we should just fix it.
> So I suspect the correct patch is just as attached instead: make
> sys_poll() just take an "int timeout". Any user who tried to use a
> long value would already have got truncated by glibc - I just checked.
> Of course, there is a remote possibility that somebody might not use
> glibc, and have used "poll()" with the raw system call interface, and
> depended on using a 64-bit "long timeout" on 64-bit architectures.
> But quite frankly, that sounds rather unlikely in the extreme.
> Comments? If we do this, and somebody actually reports that they use a
> 64-bit timeout, we could always go back to the broken 'long' argument,
> and take your patch to fix the compat case.
> Linus

Yep, this is what I thought, but when this was raised last september,
both Andrew and Andi disagreed.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2012-02-22 00:13    [W:0.068 / U:0.892 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site