Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 20 Feb 2012 13:06:42 -0800 | From | Tejun Heo <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 7/9] block: implement bio_associate_current() |
| |
Hello,
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 02:16:04PM -0500, Vivek Goyal wrote: > On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 09:01:28AM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote: > > Yeah, AFAICS, if the cloning task hasn't issued IO before, CLONE_IO is > > ignored. > > Will it make sense to try to allocate and attach io_context and then > share it in copy_io()?
Yeap, that's probably what we should do on CLONE_IO.
> Well, you are planning to kill CLONE_IO altogether, so it does not > make a difference.
Heh, I was just thinking about sending out a RFC patch. I mean, CLONE_IO handling that severely broken and nobody noticing for such long time doesn't look good, right?
Thanks.
-- tejun
| |