[lkml]   [2012]   [Feb]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 7/9] block: implement bio_associate_current()
    On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 09:01:28AM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote:
    > On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 09:36:22AM -0500, Vivek Goyal wrote:
    > > In copy_io(), we don't share the io_context if "current" does not have
    > > task->io_context set. Does that mean if even if I specify CLONE_IO, two
    > > threads might not share io context depending on when clone() happened? Or
    > > I am reading the code wrong.
    > Yeah, AFAICS, if the cloning task hasn't issued IO before, CLONE_IO is
    > ignored.

    Will it make sense to try to allocate and attach io_context and then
    share it in copy_io()?

    Well, you are planning to kill CLONE_IO altogether, so it does not
    make a difference.


     \ /
      Last update: 2012-02-20 20:19    [W:0.020 / U:6.480 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site